Ferrari trick in Suzuka: How Leclerc protected himself against attacks from Russell

Ferrari trick in Suzuka: How Leclerc protected himself against attacks from Russell

– Mercedes driver George Russell was not on the podium for the first time this season at the Japanese Grand Prix because he could not find a way past Ferrari driver Charles Leclerc in the closing stages of the race. This was mainly due to the fact that the Scuderia had optimized its energy management accordingly.

Read more April Fools! So, did you fall for it too?

Title image for the news: Charles Leclerc successfully defended himself against George Russell

This assessment is also supported by race winner Kimi Antonelli, who already dueled with the Monegasque in the first stint. “It was difficult to overtake Charles because he used the battery at strategic points, exactly in the places where you can attack,” explains the Italian, who by his own admission had “great difficulty.”

At the same time, Ferrari benefited from the special characteristics of the Suzuka International Racing Course, which allows for more effective defense in certain situations: For the attacker, it was generally most effective to use the energy between Spoon and the final chicane.

This is because the speeds in this section are significantly higher, while the car in front experiences a greater drop in speed as soon as the MGU-K support drops off. Because Suzuka has three consecutive acceleration phases, energy management becomes a crucial strategic factor.

Japan Data: Why Antonelli would have won even without a safety car!

Ferrari trick in Suzuka: How Leclerc protected himself against attacks from Russell

If the attacker uses too much energy before the final chicane, there is a risk, even after a successful overtaking maneuver, of not having enough battery power left to defend on the following start-finish straight and being overtaken again immediately.

Ferrari accelerates harder than Mercedes

A dynamic that was observed several times in Japan: The new regulations amplified this effect so much that speed differences of around 30 km/h were even measured before the first corner, making counter-overtaking maneuvers easier than with the old DRS.

And this is exactly where the strategic use of energy by Ferrari and Leclerc becomes particularly clear. Unlike in qualifying, the focus was not on pure lap time, but on identifying the optimal use of battery power to specifically hinder pursuers.

Charles Leclerc

The data (for example from lap 48) shows a clear difference to Mercedes’ approach: Ferrari tended to use more energy out of the hairpin to carry momentum towards Spoon, and went into so-called super-clipping earlier and more aggressively before Turn 13 than Mercedes.

The same pattern was evident at the exit of Spoon, where Leclerc was significantly more effective in the acceleration phase, also thanks to a slightly different interpretation of this section of the track. Antonelli confirmed this impression in conversation with other drivers in the area behind the podium.

Ferrari uses lead for energy recovery

In essence, Ferrari gained speed on the straights, gained a small lead early in the first part of the acceleration phase, and forced Mercedes to use more energy in the second half to catch up and – if possible – launch an attack before they themselves had to go into super-clipping.

Read more Andrea Stella praises Piastri as “strongest Oscar since his Formula 1 debut”

This “yo-yo effect” opened up a certain flexibility in defense because it allowed Leclerc to recover energy in time to also protect himself from the Mercedes driver’s attack on the following start-finish straight.

However, another aspect must be taken into account: Due to the current interpretation of the rules, energy delivery resumes when using boost mode as soon as the driver accelerates again, even if there was a brief lift before 130R.

FIA reaction to Bearman crash: Will something be changed? I F1 Japan 2026

Ferrari trick in Suzuka: How Leclerc protected himself against attacks from Russell

This is exactly what happened to Lando Norris, for example, during his overtaking maneuver against Lewis Hamilton in the closing stages of the race. This limits the driver’s ability to maintain control over energy delivery, which the world champion clearly criticized afterwards.

In some cases, an overtaking maneuver is almost “forced” by this, as was the case with Russell on lap 50 when he overtook Leclerc in the final chicane while the Monegasque was in super-clipping.

The problem with this: Energy consumption is high and you run the risk of being left without sufficient battery reserves for defense, which makes a counter-maneuver easier. Russell also had to let Leclerc overtake him again for this reason.

Ferrari team principal Vasseur: “We can do it”

Undoubtedly, some track characteristics also played a decisive role, from the layout to the practically non-existent graining and the low tire wear on the new asphalt. Suzuka is traditionally a track where overtaking is difficult, as was also seen last year.

To be successful here, however, additional strategic finesse was required, which Ferrari demonstrated. After the race, team principal Frederic Vasseur therefore emphasized the importance of the podium, especially for morale: “We want to achieve more, but I think it was a really very strong finale from Charles against Russell.”

Most read
  • 24h NürburgringWhat Verstappen did on the Nordschleife just 48 hours after Japan
  • Formula 1April Fools! Well, did you fall for it too?
  • DTMDTM 2026: Starting grid with 21 cars is set – who is in and who is missing
  • MotoGPYamaha crisis worsens: Quartararo expects “very long season”

“It was important for us to keep Mercedes behind us and to keep Russell behind us,” Vasseur emphasizes. “In the last ten laps, he also showed everyone at the factory and in the team: We can do it. That means a lot and is the best way to go into the break.”

Read more Lewis Hamilton at a loss after sixth place in Japan: Something must have been wrong with the car

Translated from

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *