"Loved it": Why George Russell celebrates the new regulations

– For George Russell, the dream of victory in Canada ended in an absolute nightmare. A defect in the power unit forced the Mercedes driver to retire prematurely in lap 30, ending a hard fight until then with his teammate and championship rival Andrea Kimi Antonelli. (More on this in our column)

Read more Black Sunday: Russell punished after dropout as well!

But instead of sinking into frustration after the knockout blow, the Briton used the media echo to deliver a passionate speech in favor of the often criticized new regulations. The two Silver Arrows had previously literally lifted the spectators off their seats in the stands. After a weak start from pole position, Russell regained the lead in lap 5 at the last chicane.

Antonelli braked too late while defending, and the two cars nearly collided. Afterwards, the two Mercedes drivers stalked each other for laps and exchanged positions several times. “I loved it,” Russell enthused afterwards. “I haven’t had a duel like that in years. Such a battle probably hasn’t happened since Lewis and Nico raced each other in Bahrain in 2014.” (To the race report)

Deceptive Canada Effect

For the Briton, it is clear who deserves the credit for this show: “These new cars make it possible. These new engines allow something like this. I don’t understand at all why anyone would want to change anything about it. We already had fantastic duels in Melbourne, just like in China. That Kimi and I could duel here is solely due to these power units.”

The reality, however, is not as simple as Russell presents it. The Briton is literally comparing apples to oranges here. Many overtaking maneuvers in the first races of the season were characterized by the much-criticized “jo-jo effect” – dictated by cars meeting on the straights with completely different battery charge levels.

The comparison with the legendary “Duel in the Desert” 2014 also falls short. The battle between Hamilton and Rosberg was then based on different tire strategies on extremely rough desert asphalt, not on sheer engine power. (To the Formula 1 database)

Criticism not the same, dissatisfaction already

The only real parallel between Bahrain 2014 and Canada 2026 is the political climate. Both races took place early in a season in which new engine rules caused massive dissatisfaction. Back then, prominent figures complained about the lack of sound from the new V6 hybrids; today, it’s about power delivery.

Read more After a «great» weekend: Hamilton ignores Ferrari simulator

That the race in Montreal gave such a flattering testimony to the current technical regulations was mainly due to the track layout. The course in Montreal offers hardly any room for different strategies in recovering and discharging electrical energy.

In addition, extremely cool temperatures caused slippery asphalt and unsettled cars, which further suppressed the feared jo-jo effect. But behind the scenes, things are still simmering.

Mercedes on a political course

FIA, teams, and engine manufacturers are already negotiating compromises to adjust the ratio between combustion and electric power for the coming season. Mercedes is dancing out of line here. There is hardly any criticism from the team and drivers. Probably also because the season could hardly be going better for the Silver Arrows at the moment.

Toto Wolff still slightly tempers the praise hymns of his protégé and admits that the track has masked the weaknesses of the regulations well. “I think this extremely good race was really track-specific,” analyzes the Mercedes team boss. “There will be more difficult ones again. But we have long preached that every single race has offered good entertainment on its own.”

The Mercedes boss warns caution with possible rule adjustments: “We now have to dissect these rules with a scalpel and improve them selectively, instead of completely overshooting the mark and actually making everything worse.”

Read more Who slept best last night: Lewis Hamilton